Affidavit of Ned Cassem, MD in Paul Edwards v. the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and Michael Smith Foster

 

1.   I am Ned Cassem, MD, former Chief of MGH Psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital.  I am currently on staff at Massachusetts General Hospital and am a Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.  I have been practicing psychiatry for 35 years.

 

2.  I have been consulted in the matter of Paul Edwards vs. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and Michael Smith Foster, Suffolk Superior Court Civil Action No. 02-3603.  I have not examined Mr. Edwards and I have based my opinions on facts and statements as outlined below.

  1. Based upon my review, I believe that there is a reasonable [ ] that Paul Edwards is a danger to Michael Smith Foster and possibly others including Cardinal Bernard Law.

 

  1. It is my understanding that Mr. Edwards’ history of illnesses, real and feigned, date back to pre-school and have escalated through the years and have culminated in his “paraplegia”.

 

  1. It is my understanding that Mr. Edwards’ father and others have stated that Mr. Edwards “loved” being injured and craved attention and exaggerated situations to the point of fabrication.  Mr. Edwards’ family and friends attributed his many complaints and illness, including deafness, to his need for attention.

 

  1. It is my understanding that Mr. Edwards claims to be a paraplegic stemming from a hockey accident in June 1993.  However, according to Mr. Edwards’ father, Mr. Edwards was claiming problems with his legs prior to his wedding in April 1993.

 

  1. Prior to the wedding, Paul Edwards was employed at Gillette.  Paul Edwards’ father further said that the company physician believed that Mr. Edwards suffered from Munchausen’s Syndrome and was concerned that the emotional trauma of Mr. Edwards’ upcoming wedding would exacerbate Mr. Edwards’ problems.

 

  1. It is my understanding that Mr. Edwards began using a cane before the wedding and after the honeymoon complained of worsening symptoms.  Mr. Edwards was hospitalized for approximately 10 days in ---- 1993 and that he has been in a wheelchair for the past nine years.  In newspaper accounts, Mr. Edwards is quoted as saying that he was injured in an ice hockey accident.

 

  1. It is my understanding that no organic cause for his paralysis was ever found.  The medical team at New England Rehab suggested psychiatric treatment.  His father and others recall that Mr. Edwards claimed that his parents and doctors had gone behind his back and Mr. Edwards checked out of the hospital against medical advice.

 

  1. Paul claimed in a newspaper article that he “lost the extremities [sic] in the lower half of my body.  I have a spinal infection that leaves me with a lack of blood supply to the lower limbs.”  His family claims that there is no organic reason for his alleged paralysis.

 

  1. Two witnesses have stated that they have seen Paul Edwards standing—something inconsistent with his paraplegia claims.

 

  1. Paul Edwards is estranged from his father and oftentimes the entire family.  He has made claims of being involved in semi-professional hockey, even though he was thought to be a below average skater and hockey player.  He has sought attention through the newspaper especially during the time of Travis Roy’s tragic accident in a Boston University hockey game.

 

  1. Mr. Edwards father advises that Paul Edwards is an accomplished bow hunter and has taken taxidermy classes.  It is unknown whether Paul Edwards has access to a gun.

 

  1. Based on all of this, I believe that Michael Smith Foster to be in danger.  I have advised Msgr. Foster to take precautions including using a Kevlar vest, to obtain a restraining order if possible, to learn how to use a gun, to contact local police and otherwise be vigilant against possible attack from Paul Edwards.

 

  1. Mr. Edwards' history is consistent with his being a sociopath or psychopath.  In my opinion, to a reasonable degree of psychiatric certainty, Mr. Edwards is a threat to the physical safety of Msgr. Foster.

 

  1. His lawsuit is an attack on Michael Smith Foster.  Paul Edwards has planned his attack on Michael Smith Foster since at least April 2002 when he tried to gather support from his friends for the lawsuit.  He has attacked Michael Smith Foster with the filing of the lawsuit

 

  1. Mr. Edward’s lawyer advises that he is now under medical care as a result of the negative press Paul Edwards has received.

 

  1. In my professional opinion, Paul Edwards represents a threat to Michael Smith Foster’s personal safety and also that of others.

 

 

 

Signed under the pains and penalty of perjury this___[29th]____ day of August, 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

Ned Cassem, M.D.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School

 

Cassem's response to the Church investigator's charge that this affidavit was fraudulent

 

 

Investigative report in the Boston Herald

 

"Opinionated Jesuit psychiatrist loses confidence of peers," an article on Cassem from the Catholic News.

 

How Ned Cassem Pulled his Colleagues at Mass General into the scandal in the Church

 

CCS Homepage